Demographics details for Little suamico, WI vs Ozark, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Little suamico, WI vs Ozark, AL.

Data Little suamico Ozark
Population 4,878 14,299
Median Age 41.0 years 40.9 years
Median Income $74,800 $47,407
Married Families 56.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Little suamico vs Ozark

  • The population in Ozark is higher at 14,299, compared to 4,878 in Little suamico.
  • Residents in Little suamico have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 40.9 years in Ozark.
  • Little suamico has a higher median income of $74,800 compared to $47,407 in Ozark.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Little suamico at 56.0% compared to 36.0% in Ozark.
  • The poverty level is higher in Ozark at 15%, compared to 5% in Little suamico.
  • Ozark has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.

Demographics

Demographics Little suamico vs Ozark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Little suamico Ozark
Black 1 30
White 95 57
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 1 3
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Little suamico vs Ozark

  • In Ozark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • Little suamico has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 57% in Ozark.
  • In Ozark, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Little suamico.
  • Ozark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ozark at 3%, compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • In Ozark, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Little suamico.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Little suamico Ozark
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.1%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.7%
Depression Data is updating% 23.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 21.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.7%
Obesity Data is updating% 40.3%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Little suamico vs Ozark

  • In Ozark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Ozark at 23.6% versus 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Ozark has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ozark at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Ozark has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ozark at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Little suamico Ozark
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.9% (267)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.7% (2,251)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.1% (2,307)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.8% (1,831)

Education Levels Comparison: Little suamico vs Ozark

  • In Ozark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • In Ozark, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ozark at 16.1%, compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • In Ozark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.