Demographics details for Little rock, AR vs Pflugerville, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Little rock, AR vs Pflugerville, TX.

Data Little rock Pflugerville
Population 202,864 65,556
Median Age 36.6 years 37.1 years
Median Income $58,697 $111,151
Married Families 32.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 14% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 4.1

Population Comparison: Little rock vs Pflugerville

  • In Little rock, the population is higher at 202,864, compared to 65,556 in Pflugerville.
  • The median age in Pflugerville is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 36.6 years in Little rock.
  • Pflugerville has a higher median income of $111,151, compared to $58,697 in Little rock.
  • In Pflugerville, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Little rock.
  • Little rock has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 6% in Pflugerville.
  • Pflugerville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.7% in Little rock.

Demographics

Demographics Little rock vs Pflugerville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Little rock Pflugerville
Black 41 17
White 44 28
Asian 3 8
Hispanic 8 33
Two or More Races 4 14
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Little rock vs Pflugerville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Little rock at 41% compared to 17% in Pflugerville.
  • Little rock has a higher percentage of White residents at 44% compared to 28% in Pflugerville.
  • In Pflugerville, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Little rock.
  • Pflugerville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 8% in Little rock.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pflugerville at 14%, compared to 4% in Little rock.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little rock and Pflugerville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Little rock Pflugerville
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 9.5%
Depression 21.9% 20.8%
Smoking 19.0% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 19.9%
Obesity 39.0% 28.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Little rock vs Pflugerville

  • More residents in Little rock report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.2% in Pflugerville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Little rock at 21.9% compared to 20.8% in Pflugerville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Little rock at 19.0% compared to 11.5% in Pflugerville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pflugerville at 19.9% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Little rock at 39.0% compared to 28.2% in Pflugerville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Little rock at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Pflugerville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Little rock Pflugerville
No Schooling 0.7% (1,359) 0.8% (519)
High School Diploma 12.2% (24,667) 12.1% (7,925)
Less than High School 7.3% (14,766) 7.6% (4,951)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.4% (59,641) 27.3% (17,919)

Education Levels Comparison: Little rock vs Pflugerville

  • In Pflugerville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Little rock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Little rock hold a high school diploma at 12.2% compared to 12.1% in Pflugerville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pflugerville at 7.6%, compared to 7.3% in Little rock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Little rock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 27.3% in Pflugerville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.