Demographics details for Little rock, AR vs Parker, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Little rock, AR vs Parker, SD.
| Data | Little rock | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 202,864 | 1,221 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $58,697 | $83,864 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Little rock vs Parker
- In Little rock, the population is higher at 202,864, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- The median age in Parker is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 36.6 years in Little rock.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864, compared to $58,697 in Little rock.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Little rock.
- Little rock has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Little rock is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Little rock vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Little rock | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 41 | 4 |
| White | 44 | 85 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Little rock vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Little rock at 41% compared to 4% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 85% compared to 44% in Little rock.
- The Asian population is larger in Little rock at 3% compared to 0% in Parker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Little rock at 8% compared to 5% in Parker.
- Both Little rock and Parker have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Parker, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Little rock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Little rock | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Little rock vs Parker
- More residents in Little rock report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Little rock at 21.9% compared to 17.8% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Little rock at 19.0% compared to 16.4% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 20.4% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Little rock at 39.0% compared to 34.4% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Little rock at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Little rock | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,359) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (24,667) | 17.9% (218) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (14,766) | 13.0% (159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.4% (59,641) | 12.9% (158) |
Education Levels Comparison: Little rock vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Little rock have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 13.0%, compared to 7.3% in Little rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Little rock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.