Demographics details for Little rock, AR vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Little rock, AR vs Cedar lake, IN.
Data | Little rock | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 202,864 | 15,592 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $58,697 | $84,444 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Little rock vs Cedar lake
- In Little rock, the population is higher at 202,864, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- The median age in Cedar lake is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 36.6 years in Little rock.
- Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $58,697 in Little rock.
- In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 32.0% in Little rock.
- Little rock has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate in Little rock is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Little rock vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Little rock | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Black | 41 | Data is updating |
White | 44 | 94 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Little rock vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Little rock at 41% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 44% in Little rock.
- The Asian population is larger in Little rock at 3% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Little rock at 8% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Little rock at 4% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little rock and Cedar lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Little rock | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.1% |
Depression | 21.9% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 19.0% | 18.8% |
Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 19.8% |
Obesity | 39.0% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Little rock vs Cedar lake
- More residents in Little rock report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 21.9% in Little rock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Little rock at 19.0% compared to 18.8% in Cedar lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Little rock at 39.0% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Little rock at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Little rock | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (1,359) | 0.4% (67) |
High School Diploma | 12.2% (24,667) | 21.1% (3,292) |
Less than High School | 7.3% (14,766) | 7.1% (1,102) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.4% (59,641) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Little rock vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Little rock have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
- More residents in Little rock have less than a high school education at 7.3% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Little rock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.