Demographics details for Little falls, MN vs Trimble, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Little falls, MN vs Trimble, TN.
| Data | Little falls | Trimble |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,094 | 537 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $44,455 | $50,625 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Little falls vs Trimble
- In Little falls, the population is higher at 9,094, compared to 537 in Trimble.
- Residents in Little falls have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 39.2 years in Trimble.
- Trimble has a higher median income of $50,625, compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Little falls at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Trimble.
- The poverty level is higher in Trimble at 12%, compared to 11% in Little falls.
- The unemployment rate in Little falls is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Trimble.
Demographics
Demographics Little falls vs Trimble provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Little falls | Trimble |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 95 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Little falls vs Trimble
- In Trimble, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Little falls.
- Little falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 87% in Trimble.
- Both Little falls and Trimble have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Little falls at 1% compared to 0% in Trimble.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trimble at 9%, compared to 3% in Little falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little falls and Trimble at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Little falls | Trimble |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 20.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Little falls vs Trimble
- In Trimble, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trimble at 29.9% versus 25.0% in Little falls.
- Trimble has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 22.3% in Little falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 15.7% in Trimble.
- Obesity rates are higher in Little falls at 38.5% compared to 33.5% in Trimble.
- Disability percentages are higher in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Trimble.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Little falls | Trimble |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (63) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (2,308) | 23.6% (127) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (1,063) | 21.2% (114) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.3% (1,301) | 6.3% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Little falls vs Trimble
- A higher percentage of residents in Little falls have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Trimble.
- A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 23.6% in Trimble.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trimble at 21.2%, compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 6.3% in Trimble.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.