Demographics details for Little falls, MN vs South cle elum, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Little falls, MN vs South cle elum, WA.

Data Little falls South cle elum
Population 9,094 564
Median Age 40.8 years 35.2 years
Median Income $44,455 $56,400
Married Families 34.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 11% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.0

Population Comparison: Little falls vs South cle elum

  • In Little falls, the population is higher at 9,094, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • Residents in Little falls have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher median income of $56,400, compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
  • In South cle elum, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
  • Little falls has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Little falls.

Demographics

Demographics Little falls vs South cle elum provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Little falls South cle elum
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 95 84
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 6
Two or More Races 3 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Little falls vs South cle elum

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Little falls and South cle elum at 0%.
  • Little falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 84% in South cle elum.
  • The Asian population is larger in Little falls at 1% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South cle elum at 10%, compared to 3% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little falls and South cle elum at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Little falls South cle elum
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 11.9%
Depression 25.0% 26.2%
Smoking 22.3% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 20.6% 18.3%
Obesity 38.5% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Little falls vs South cle elum

  • In South cle elum, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South cle elum at 26.2% versus 25.0% in Little falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Little falls at 22.3% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 18.3% in South cle elum.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Little falls at 38.5% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 17.0% in Little falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Little falls South cle elum
No Schooling 0.7% (63) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 25.4% (2,308) 22.2% (125)
Less than High School 11.7% (1,063) 21.6% (122)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.3% (1,301) 20.6% (116)

Education Levels Comparison: Little falls vs South cle elum

  • A higher percentage of residents in Little falls have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 22.2% in South cle elum.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South cle elum at 21.6%, compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
  • In South cle elum, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.