Demographics details for Little falls, MN vs Riverhead, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Little falls, MN vs Riverhead, NY.

Data Little falls Riverhead
Population 9,094 33,539
Median Age 40.8 years 42.0 years
Median Income $44,455 $80,000
Married Families 34.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 11% 7%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.3

Population Comparison: Little falls vs Riverhead

  • The population in Riverhead is higher at 33,539, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
  • The median age in Riverhead is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 40.8 years in Little falls.
  • Riverhead has a higher median income of $80,000, compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
  • In Riverhead, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
  • Little falls has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Riverhead.
  • The unemployment rate in Little falls is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.3% in Riverhead.

Demographics

Demographics Little falls vs Riverhead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Little falls Riverhead
Black Data is updating 10
White 95 70
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 1 15
Two or More Races 3 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Little falls vs Riverhead

  • In Riverhead, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Little falls.
  • Little falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 70% in Riverhead.
  • In Riverhead, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Little falls.
  • Riverhead has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Little falls at 3% compared to 0% in Riverhead.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little falls and Riverhead at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Little falls Riverhead
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% Data is updating%
Depression 25.0% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 20.6% Data is updating%
Obesity 38.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 17.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Little falls vs Riverhead

  • More residents in Little falls report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Little falls at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Little falls at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Little falls at 38.5% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Little falls Riverhead
No Schooling 0.7% (63) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 25.4% (2,308) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 11.7% (1,063) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.3% (1,301) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Little falls vs Riverhead

  • A higher percentage of residents in Little falls have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • More residents in Little falls have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.