Demographics details for Little falls, MN vs Richardson, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Little falls, MN vs Richardson, TX.

Data Little falls Richardson
Population 9,094 118,802
Median Age 40.8 years 34.5 years
Median Income $44,455 $94,362
Married Families 34.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 11% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.9

Population Comparison: Little falls vs Richardson

  • The population in Richardson is higher at 118,802, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
  • Residents in Little falls have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
  • Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362, compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
  • In Richardson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
  • Little falls has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Richardson.
  • The unemployment rate in Little falls is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Richardson.

Demographics

Demographics Little falls vs Richardson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Little falls Richardson
Black Data is updating 12
White 95 49
Asian 1 15
Hispanic 1 17
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Little falls vs Richardson

  • In Richardson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in Little falls.
  • Little falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 49% in Richardson.
  • In Richardson, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Little falls.
  • Richardson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richardson at 7%, compared to 3% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little falls and Richardson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Little falls Richardson
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 8.9%
Depression 25.0% 20.9%
Smoking 22.3% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 20.6% 18.3%
Obesity 38.5% 28.2%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Little falls vs Richardson

  • More residents in Little falls report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Little falls at 25.0% compared to 20.9% in Richardson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Little falls at 22.3% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 18.3% in Richardson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Little falls at 38.5% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Little falls Richardson
No Schooling 0.7% (63) 1.4% (1,646)
High School Diploma 25.4% (2,308) 6.8% (8,041)
Less than High School 11.7% (1,063) 8.4% (10,002)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.3% (1,301) 36.7% (43,584)

Education Levels Comparison: Little falls vs Richardson

  • In Richardson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Little falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
  • More residents in Little falls have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
  • In Richardson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.