Demographics details for Little falls, MN vs Clarendon, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Little falls, MN vs Clarendon, TX.
| Data | Little falls | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,094 | 1,948 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $44,455 | $47,457 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Little falls vs Clarendon
- In Little falls, the population is higher at 9,094, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
- Residents in Little falls have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
- Clarendon has a higher median income of $47,457, compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Little falls at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
- Little falls has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Clarendon.
- The unemployment rate in Little falls is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Clarendon.
Demographics
Demographics Little falls vs Clarendon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Little falls | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 11 |
| White | 95 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Little falls vs Clarendon
- In Clarendon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Little falls.
- Little falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 76% in Clarendon.
- In Clarendon, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Little falls.
- Clarendon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Little falls.
- Both Little falls and Clarendon have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little falls and Clarendon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Little falls | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Little falls vs Clarendon
- In Clarendon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarendon at 25.8% versus 25.0% in Little falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Little falls at 22.3% compared to 20.1% in Clarendon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 18.3% in Clarendon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Little falls at 38.5% compared to 38.4% in Clarendon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Little falls | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (63) | 0.7% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (2,308) | 11.4% (222) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (1,063) | 17.6% (342) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.3% (1,301) | 7.3% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Little falls vs Clarendon
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Little falls and Clarendon at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarendon at 17.6%, compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.