Demographics details for Little falls, MN vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Little falls, MN vs Cambridge, OH.
| Data | Little falls | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,094 | 9,985 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $44,455 | $39,589 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Little falls vs Cambridge
- The population in Cambridge is higher at 9,985, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
- Residents in Little falls have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Little falls has a higher median income of $44,455 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Little falls at 34.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 11% in Little falls.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Little falls.
Demographics
Demographics Little falls vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Little falls | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 95 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Little falls vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Little falls.
- Little falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 88% in Cambridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Little falls at 1% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Little falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cambridge at 4%, compared to 3% in Little falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Little falls and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Little falls | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 46.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Little falls vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 25.0% in Little falls.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 22.3% in Little falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 38.5% in Little falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Little falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Little falls | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (63) | 0.7% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (2,308) | 25.1% (2,502) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (1,063) | 17.3% (1,732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.3% (1,301) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Little falls vs Cambridge
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Little falls and Cambridge at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 25.1% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.