Demographics details for Litchfield, MN vs Swainsboro, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield, MN vs Swainsboro, GA.

Data Litchfield Swainsboro
Population 6,602 7,583
Median Age 45.3 years 30.1 years
Median Income $60,804 $44,491
Married Families 39.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 8% 24%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Litchfield vs Swainsboro

  • The population in Swainsboro is higher at 7,583, compared to 6,602 in Litchfield.
  • Residents in Litchfield have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
  • Litchfield has a higher median income of $60,804 compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Litchfield at 39.0% compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Swainsboro at 24%, compared to 8% in Litchfield.
  • Swainsboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Litchfield.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield vs Swainsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield Swainsboro
Black Data is updating 57
White 91 33
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 7 4
Two or More Races 1 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield vs Swainsboro

  • In Swainsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 0% in Litchfield.
  • Litchfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
  • Both Litchfield and Swainsboro have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Litchfield at 7% compared to 4% in Swainsboro.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Swainsboro at 6%, compared to 1% in Litchfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Litchfield at 1% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield Swainsboro
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 14.6%
Depression 24.2% 20.6%
Smoking 19.7% 22.6%
Binge Drinking 20.9% 13.6%
Obesity 34.7% 42.6%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield vs Swainsboro

  • In Swainsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Litchfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Litchfield at 24.2% compared to 20.6% in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 19.7% in Litchfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Litchfield at 20.9% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 34.7% in Litchfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Litchfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield Swainsboro
No Schooling 0.0% (1) 1.9% (147)
High School Diploma 23.0% (1,520) 16.7% (1,264)
Less than High School 7.1% (472) 11.6% (879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.5% (888) 6.6% (500)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield vs Swainsboro

  • In Swainsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 16.7% in Swainsboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Swainsboro at 11.6%, compared to 7.1% in Litchfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.