Demographics details for Litchfield, MN vs Rowlett, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield, MN vs Rowlett, TX.
| Data | Litchfield | Rowlett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,602 | 65,113 |
| Median Age | 45.3 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $60,804 | $110,954 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Litchfield vs Rowlett
- The population in Rowlett is higher at 65,113, compared to 6,602 in Litchfield.
- Residents in Litchfield have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 38.6 years in Rowlett.
- Rowlett has a higher median income of $110,954, compared to $60,804 in Litchfield.
- In Rowlett, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 39.0% in Litchfield.
- Litchfield has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Rowlett.
- Rowlett has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Litchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Litchfield vs Rowlett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Litchfield | Rowlett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 21 |
| White | 91 | 42 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Litchfield vs Rowlett
- In Rowlett, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Litchfield.
- Litchfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 42% in Rowlett.
- In Rowlett, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Litchfield.
- Rowlett has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 7% in Litchfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rowlett at 9%, compared to 1% in Litchfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Litchfield at 1% compared to 0% in Rowlett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Litchfield | Rowlett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield vs Rowlett
- More residents in Litchfield report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Rowlett.
- Depression is more prevalent in Litchfield at 24.2% compared to 21.8% in Rowlett.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Litchfield at 19.7% compared to 12.8% in Rowlett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Litchfield at 20.9% compared to 20.0% in Rowlett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Litchfield at 34.7% compared to 30.4% in Rowlett.
- Disability percentages are higher in Litchfield at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Rowlett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Litchfield | Rowlett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (1) | 0.5% (331) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (1,520) | 12.7% (8,282) |
| Less than High School | 7.1% (472) | 7.7% (5,011) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (888) | 25.3% (16,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield vs Rowlett
- In Rowlett, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 12.7% in Rowlett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rowlett at 7.7%, compared to 7.1% in Litchfield.
- In Rowlett, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 13.5% in Litchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.