Demographics details for Litchfield, ME vs Marshall, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield, ME vs Marshall, AR.

Data Litchfield Marshall
Population 3,642 1,339
Median Age 42.0 years 52.3 years
Median Income $85,000 $28,290
Married Families 60.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 5% 16%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Litchfield vs Marshall

  • In Litchfield, the population is higher at 3,642, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
  • The median age in Marshall is higher at 52.3 years, compared to 42.0 years in Litchfield.
  • Litchfield has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Litchfield at 60.0% compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
  • The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 16%, compared to 5% in Litchfield.
  • Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Litchfield.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield Marshall
Black 1 Data is updating
White 96 84
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 3
Two or More Races 1 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield vs Marshall

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Litchfield at 1% compared to 0% in Marshall.
  • Litchfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 84% in Marshall.
  • The Asian population is larger in Litchfield at 1% compared to 0% in Marshall.
  • Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Litchfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshall at 12%, compared to 1% in Litchfield.
  • In Marshall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Litchfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield Marshall
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 21.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.2%
Depression Data is updating% 29.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 27.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.7%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.2%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield vs Marshall

  • In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Marshall at 29.8% versus 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • Marshall has a higher smoking rate at 27.2% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Marshall at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • Marshall has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield Marshall
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (12)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 27.9% (373)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 32.4% (434)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.7% (156)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield vs Marshall

  • In Marshall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • In Marshall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marshall at 32.4%, compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.
  • In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 0.0% in Litchfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.