Demographics details for Litchfield park, AZ vs Saginaw, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield park, AZ vs Saginaw, MI.

Data Litchfield park Saginaw
Population 6,960 43,477
Median Age 47.7 years 34.5 years
Median Income $117,601 $35,521
Married Families 52.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 5% 24%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 10.2

Population Comparison: Litchfield park vs Saginaw

  • The population in Saginaw is higher at 43,477, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
  • Residents in Litchfield park have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 34.5 years in Saginaw.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601 compared to $35,521 in Saginaw.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Litchfield park at 52.0% compared to 21.0% in Saginaw.
  • The poverty level is higher in Saginaw at 24%, compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
  • Saginaw has a higher unemployment rate at 10.2% compared to 5.1% in Litchfield park.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield park vs Saginaw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield park Saginaw
Black 2 47
White 57 25
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 17
Two or More Races 12 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Saginaw

  • In Saginaw, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
  • Litchfield park has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 25% in Saginaw.
  • The Asian population is larger in Litchfield park at 6% compared to 0% in Saginaw.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Litchfield park at 23% compared to 17% in Saginaw.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Litchfield park at 12% compared to 11% in Saginaw.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Litchfield park and Saginaw at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield park Saginaw
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 21.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 16.8%
Depression 18.9% 23.9%
Smoking 10.7% 26.7%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 13.6%
Obesity 27.2% 51.1%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Saginaw

  • In Saginaw, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Saginaw at 23.9% versus 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Saginaw has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 13.6% in Saginaw.
  • Saginaw has higher obesity rates at 51.1% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Saginaw at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield park Saginaw
No Schooling 0.2% (16) 1.1% (489)
High School Diploma 11.2% (777) 18.7% (8,145)
Less than High School 2.2% (150) 16.8% (7,322)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.0% (2,504) 8.3% (3,613)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield park vs Saginaw

  • In Saginaw, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Saginaw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Saginaw at 16.8%, compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 8.3% in Saginaw.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.