Demographics details for Litchfield park, AZ vs Pesotum, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield park, AZ vs Pesotum, IL.

Data Litchfield park Pesotum
Population 6,960 547
Median Age 47.7 years 43.6 years
Median Income $117,601 $80,938
Married Families 52.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 2.5

Population Comparison: Litchfield park vs Pesotum

  • In Litchfield park, the population is higher at 6,960, compared to 547 in Pesotum.
  • Residents in Litchfield park have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 43.6 years in Pesotum.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601 compared to $80,938 in Pesotum.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Litchfield park at 52.0% compared to 42.0% in Pesotum.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Litchfield park and Pesotum at 5%.
  • The unemployment rate in Litchfield park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.5% in Pesotum.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield park vs Pesotum provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield park Pesotum
Black 2 Data is updating
White 57 95
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 2
Two or More Races 12 2
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Pesotum

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Litchfield park at 2% compared to 0% in Pesotum.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pesotum at 95% compared to 57% in Litchfield park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Litchfield park at 6% compared to 0% in Pesotum.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Litchfield park at 23% compared to 2% in Pesotum.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Litchfield park at 12% compared to 2% in Pesotum.
  • In Pesotum, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Litchfield park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield park Pesotum
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 9.9%
Depression 18.9% 21.9%
Smoking 10.7% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 19.0%
Obesity 27.2% 30.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Pesotum

  • In Pesotum, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pesotum at 21.9% versus 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Pesotum has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pesotum at 19.0% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Pesotum has higher obesity rates at 30.9% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Litchfield park at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Pesotum.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield park Pesotum
No Schooling 0.2% (16) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.2% (777) 26.1% (143)
Less than High School 2.2% (150) 4.4% (24)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.0% (2,504) 16.5% (90)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield park vs Pesotum

  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield park have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Pesotum.
  • In Pesotum, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pesotum at 4.4%, compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 16.5% in Pesotum.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.