Demographics details for Litchfield park, AZ vs Mikado, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield park, AZ vs Mikado, MI.

Data Litchfield park Mikado
Population 6,960 820
Median Age 47.7 years 47.7 years
Median Income $117,601 $46,250
Married Families 52.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Litchfield park vs Mikado

  • In Litchfield park, the population is higher at 6,960, compared to 820 in Mikado.
  • The median age is the same in both Litchfield park and Mikado at 47.7 years.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601 compared to $46,250 in Mikado.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Litchfield park at 52.0% compared to 42.0% in Mikado.
  • Litchfield park has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Mikado.
  • The unemployment rate in Litchfield park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Mikado.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield park vs Mikado provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield park Mikado
Black 2 3
White 57 92
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 Data is updating
Two or More Races 12 3
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Mikado

  • In Mikado, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mikado at 92% compared to 57% in Litchfield park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Litchfield park at 6% compared to 0% in Mikado.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Litchfield park at 23% compared to 0% in Mikado.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Litchfield park at 12% compared to 3% in Mikado.
  • In Mikado, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Litchfield park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield park Mikado
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% Data is updating%
Depression 18.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 10.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 27.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Mikado

  • More residents in Litchfield park report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Litchfield park at 10.7% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Litchfield park at 27.2% compared to 0.0% in Mikado.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mikado at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield park Mikado
No Schooling 0.2% (16) 0.7% (6)
High School Diploma 11.2% (777) 24.5% (201)
Less than High School 2.2% (150) 12.7% (104)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.0% (2,504) 6.1% (50)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield park vs Mikado

  • In Mikado, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Mikado, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mikado at 12.7%, compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 6.1% in Mikado.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.