Demographics details for Litchfield park, AZ vs Langston, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield park, AZ vs Langston, AL.

Data Litchfield park Langston
Population 6,960 267
Median Age 47.7 years 56.9 years
Median Income $117,601 $53,333
Married Families 52.0% 61.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.0

Population Comparison: Litchfield park vs Langston

  • In Litchfield park, the population is higher at 6,960, compared to 267 in Langston.
  • The median age in Langston is higher at 56.9 years, compared to 47.7 years in Litchfield park.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601 compared to $53,333 in Langston.
  • In Langston, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 52.0% in Litchfield park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Langston at 8%, compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
  • The unemployment rate in Litchfield park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.0% in Langston.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield park vs Langston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield park Langston
Black 2 1
White 57 96
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 3
Two or More Races 12 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Langston

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Litchfield park at 2% compared to 1% in Langston.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Langston at 96% compared to 57% in Litchfield park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Litchfield park at 6% compared to 0% in Langston.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Litchfield park at 23% compared to 3% in Langston.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Litchfield park at 12% compared to 0% in Langston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Litchfield park and Langston at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield park Langston
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 21.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 14.7%
Depression 18.9% 26.1%
Smoking 10.7% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 15.3%
Obesity 27.2% 38.3%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Langston

  • In Langston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Langston at 26.1% versus 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Langston has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 15.3% in Langston.
  • Langston has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Langston at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield park Langston
No Schooling 0.2% (16) 1.9% (5)
High School Diploma 11.2% (777) 22.1% (59)
Less than High School 2.2% (150) 18.7% (50)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.0% (2,504) 17.6% (47)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield park vs Langston

  • In Langston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Langston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Langston at 18.7%, compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 17.6% in Langston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.