Demographics details for Litchfield park, AZ vs Fort valley, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield park, AZ vs Fort valley, GA.

Data Litchfield park Fort valley
Population 6,960 8,838
Median Age 47.7 years 30.6 years
Median Income $117,601 $31,807
Married Families 52.0% 18.0%
Poverty Level 5% 25%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Litchfield park vs Fort valley

  • The population in Fort valley is higher at 8,838, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
  • Residents in Litchfield park have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Litchfield park at 52.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
  • The unemployment rate in Litchfield park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield park vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield park Fort valley
Black 2 70
White 57 18
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 8
Two or More Races 12 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
  • Litchfield park has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Litchfield park at 6% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Litchfield park at 23% compared to 8% in Fort valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Litchfield park at 12% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Litchfield park and Fort valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield park Fort valley
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 15.5%
Depression 18.9% 19.5%
Smoking 10.7% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 11.8%
Obesity 27.2% 46.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort valley at 19.5% versus 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield park Fort valley
No Schooling 0.2% (16) 3.0% (267)
High School Diploma 11.2% (777) 13.9% (1,226)
Less than High School 2.2% (150) 17.3% (1,527)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.0% (2,504) 10.8% (954)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield park vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Fort valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.