Demographics details for Litchfield park, AZ vs Clarksville, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield park, AZ vs Clarksville, TN.

Data Litchfield park Clarksville
Population 6,960 176,974
Median Age 47.7 years 30.1 years
Median Income $117,601 $62,688
Married Families 52.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.3

Population Comparison: Litchfield park vs Clarksville

  • The population in Clarksville is higher at 176,974, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
  • Residents in Litchfield park have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601 compared to $62,688 in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Litchfield park at 52.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 12%, compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
  • The unemployment rate in Litchfield park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.3% in Clarksville.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield park vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield park Clarksville
Black 2 22
White 57 55
Asian 6 3
Hispanic 23 11
Two or More Races 12 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
  • Litchfield park has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 55% in Clarksville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Litchfield park at 6% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Litchfield park at 23% compared to 11% in Clarksville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Litchfield park at 12% compared to 9% in Clarksville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Litchfield park and Clarksville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield park Clarksville
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 12.6%
Depression 18.9% 28.4%
Smoking 10.7% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 14.8%
Obesity 27.2% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 28.4% versus 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 14.8% in Clarksville.
  • Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield park Clarksville
No Schooling 0.2% (16) 0.6% (976)
High School Diploma 11.2% (777) 13.7% (24,180)
Less than High School 2.2% (150) 5.5% (9,720)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.0% (2,504) 16.7% (29,557)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield park vs Clarksville

  • In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 5.5%, compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 16.7% in Clarksville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.