Demographics details for Litchfield park, AZ vs Bethlehem, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Litchfield park, AZ vs Bethlehem, PA.

Data Litchfield park Bethlehem
Population 6,960 77,617
Median Age 47.7 years 35.9 years
Median Income $117,601 $62,072
Married Families 52.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 5% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Litchfield park vs Bethlehem

  • The population in Bethlehem is higher at 77,617, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
  • Residents in Litchfield park have a higher median age of 47.7 years compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601 compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Litchfield park at 52.0% compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bethlehem at 13%, compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
  • The unemployment rate in Litchfield park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Bethlehem.

Demographics

Demographics Litchfield park vs Bethlehem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Litchfield park Bethlehem
Black 2 9
White 57 47
Asian 6 3
Hispanic 23 30
Two or More Races 12 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
  • Litchfield park has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 47% in Bethlehem.
  • The Asian population is larger in Litchfield park at 6% compared to 3% in Bethlehem.
  • Bethlehem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 23% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Litchfield park at 12% compared to 11% in Bethlehem.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Litchfield park and Bethlehem at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Litchfield park Bethlehem
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 12.1%
Depression 18.9% 21.8%
Smoking 10.7% 18.4%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 17.6%
Obesity 27.2% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Litchfield park vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bethlehem at 21.8% versus 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Bethlehem has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Bethlehem.
  • Bethlehem has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Litchfield park and Bethlehem at 13.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Litchfield park Bethlehem
No Schooling 0.2% (16) 0.6% (452)
High School Diploma 11.2% (777) 16.9% (13,125)
Less than High School 2.2% (150) 12.9% (10,045)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.0% (2,504) 22.0% (17,044)

Education Levels Comparison: Litchfield park vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Bethlehem, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bethlehem at 12.9%, compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Litchfield park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 22.0% in Bethlehem.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.