Demographics details for Lincroft, NJ vs Rancho cucamonga, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lincroft, NJ vs Rancho cucamonga, CA.

Data Lincroft Rancho cucamonga
Population 6,793 176,336
Median Age 44.4 years 37.5 years
Median Income $186,875 $105,534
Married Families 52.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.8

Population Comparison: Lincroft vs Rancho cucamonga

  • The population in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 176,336, compared to 6,793 in Lincroft.
  • Residents in Lincroft have a higher median age of 44.4 years compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Lincroft has a higher median income of $186,875 compared to $105,534 in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lincroft at 52.0% compared to 42.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 11%, compared to 0% in Lincroft.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Lincroft.

Demographics

Demographics Lincroft vs Rancho cucamonga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lincroft Rancho cucamonga
Black Data is updating 9
White 83 22
Asian 9 14
Hispanic 3 39
Two or More Races 5 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Lincroft vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Lincroft.
  • Lincroft has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 9% in Lincroft.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 3% in Lincroft.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 15%, compared to 5% in Lincroft.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lincroft.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lincroft Rancho cucamonga
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 7.6% 9.8%
Depression 20.1% 17.2%
Smoking 10.5% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 19.9% 16.6%
Obesity 24.9% 33.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lincroft vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 13.7% in Lincroft.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lincroft at 20.1% compared to 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lincroft at 10.5% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lincroft at 19.9% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 24.9% in Lincroft.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lincroft at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lincroft Rancho cucamonga
No Schooling 0.1% (6) 1.2% (2,052)
High School Diploma 10.2% (696) 11.7% (20,590)
Less than High School 1.2% (83) 10.0% (17,566)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 44.6% (3,033) 25.3% (44,534)

Education Levels Comparison: Lincroft vs Rancho cucamonga

  • In Rancho cucamonga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Lincroft.
  • In Rancho cucamonga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.7% compared to 10.2% in Lincroft.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 10.0%, compared to 1.2% in Lincroft.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lincroft hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 25.3% in Rancho cucamonga.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.