Demographics details for Lincoln, NE vs Waterman, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lincoln, NE vs Waterman, IL.
Data | Lincoln | Waterman |
---|---|---|
Population | 292,627 | 1,427 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 36.2 years |
Median Income | $67,846 | $87,292 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Lincoln vs Waterman
- In Lincoln, the population is higher at 292,627, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
- The median age in Waterman is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 33.1 years in Lincoln.
- Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292, compared to $67,846 in Lincoln.
- In Waterman, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 37.0% in Lincoln.
- Lincoln has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.0% in Lincoln.
Demographics
Demographics Lincoln vs Waterman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lincoln | Waterman |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 76 | 78 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lincoln vs Waterman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lincoln at 4% compared to 2% in Waterman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterman at 78% compared to 76% in Lincoln.
- The Asian population is larger in Lincoln at 4% compared to 1% in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 8% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterman at 9%, compared to 7% in Lincoln.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lincoln at 1% compared to 0% in Waterman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lincoln | Waterman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 10.4% |
Depression | 19.3% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lincoln vs Waterman
- In Waterman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 14.1% in Lincoln.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterman at 21.6% versus 19.3% in Lincoln.
- Waterman has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 14.7% in Lincoln.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lincoln at 21.7% compared to 18.7% in Waterman.
- Waterman has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 34.4% in Lincoln.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Lincoln and Waterman at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lincoln | Waterman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (3,779) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 10.3% (30,238) | 22.6% (323) |
Less than High School | 7.6% (22,267) | 8.5% (122) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (73,443) | 15.5% (221) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lincoln vs Waterman
- A higher percentage of residents in Lincoln have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
- In Waterman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 10.3% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waterman at 8.5%, compared to 7.6% in Lincoln.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lincoln hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 15.5% in Waterman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.