Demographics details for Lincoln, NE vs San marcos, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lincoln, NE vs San marcos, CA.
| Data | Lincoln | San marcos |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 292,627 | 94,854 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $67,846 | $99,413 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Lincoln vs San marcos
- In Lincoln, the population is higher at 292,627, compared to 94,854 in San marcos.
- The median age in San marcos is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 33.1 years in Lincoln.
- San marcos has a higher median income of $99,413, compared to $67,846 in Lincoln.
- In San marcos, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Lincoln.
- Lincoln has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in San marcos.
- San marcos has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.0% in Lincoln.
Demographics
Demographics Lincoln vs San marcos provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lincoln | San marcos |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 76 | 31 |
| Asian | 4 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 40 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lincoln vs San marcos
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lincoln at 4% compared to 2% in San marcos.
- Lincoln has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 31% in San marcos.
- In San marcos, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 4% in Lincoln.
- San marcos has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 8% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San marcos at 16%, compared to 7% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lincoln and San marcos at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lincoln | San marcos |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 11.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 24.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lincoln vs San marcos
- In San marcos, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 14.1% in Lincoln.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lincoln at 19.3% compared to 17.8% in San marcos.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lincoln at 14.7% compared to 11.2% in San marcos.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lincoln at 21.7% compared to 18.6% in San marcos.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lincoln at 34.4% compared to 24.2% in San marcos.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lincoln at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lincoln | San marcos |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (3,779) | 1.8% (1,684) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (30,238) | 10.1% (9,567) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (22,267) | 15.0% (14,213) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (73,443) | 26.4% (25,049) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lincoln vs San marcos
- In San marcos, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.3% in Lincoln.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lincoln hold a high school diploma at 10.3% compared to 10.1% in San marcos.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San marcos at 15.0%, compared to 7.6% in Lincoln.
- In San marcos, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 25.1% in Lincoln.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.