Demographics details for Lincoln, NE vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lincoln, NE vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Lincoln | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 292,627 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $67,846 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lincoln vs Live oak
- In Lincoln, the population is higher at 292,627, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 33.1 years in Lincoln.
- Lincoln has a higher median income of $67,846 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lincoln at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 12% in Lincoln.
- Live oak has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.0% in Lincoln.
Demographics
Demographics Lincoln vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lincoln | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 38 |
| White | 76 | 41 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lincoln vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 4% in Lincoln.
- Lincoln has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- The Asian population is larger in Lincoln at 4% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 8% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 7% in Lincoln.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lincoln at 1% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lincoln | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lincoln vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.1% in Lincoln.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 19.3%.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 14.7% in Lincoln.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lincoln at 21.7% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Live oak has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 34.4% in Lincoln.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Live oak at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Lincoln.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lincoln | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (3,779) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (30,238) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (22,267) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (73,443) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lincoln vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.3% in Lincoln.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 10.3% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Live oak at 11.3%, compared to 7.6% in Lincoln.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lincoln hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.