Demographics details for Lexington, TN vs Van vleck, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, TN vs Van vleck, TX.
| Data | Lexington | Van vleck |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,952 | 1,049 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 48.5 years |
| Median Income | $45,877 | $72,337 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 71.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Van vleck
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 7,952, compared to 1,049 in Van vleck.
- The median age in Van vleck is higher at 48.5 years, compared to 36.6 years in Lexington.
- Van vleck has a higher median income of $72,337, compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- In Van vleck, the percentage of married families is higher at 71.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Van vleck at 15%, compared to 13% in Lexington.
- Van vleck has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Van vleck provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Van vleck |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 7 |
| White | 81 | 50 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Van vleck
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 17% compared to 7% in Van vleck.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 50% in Van vleck.
- Both Lexington and Van vleck have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Van vleck has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Van vleck at 7%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Van vleck at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Van vleck |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.6% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 30.4% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 26.1% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Van vleck
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 18.4% in Van vleck.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 30.4% compared to 23.6% in Van vleck.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 26.1% compared to 18.8% in Van vleck.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Van vleck at 17.8% compared to 14.4% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 39.9% compared to 39.8% in Van vleck.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Van vleck.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Van vleck |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (29) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.4% (1,783) | 19.7% (207) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (1,159) | 13.3% (140) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (740) | 17.7% (186) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Van vleck
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Van vleck.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 19.7% in Van vleck.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 13.3% in Van vleck.
- In Van vleck, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.