Demographics details for Lexington, TN vs Salt lake city, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, TN vs Salt lake city, UT.

Data Lexington Salt lake city
Population 7,952 204,657
Median Age 36.6 years 32.5 years
Median Income $45,877 $72,357
Married Families 35.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 13% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Lexington vs Salt lake city

  • The population in Salt lake city is higher at 204,657, compared to 7,952 in Lexington.
  • Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 32.5 years in Salt lake city.
  • Salt lake city has a higher median income of $72,357, compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lexington at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Salt lake city.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Lexington and Salt lake city at 13%.
  • The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Salt lake city.

Demographics

Demographics Lexington vs Salt lake city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lexington Salt lake city
Black 17 3
White 81 63
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 1 20
Two or More Races 1 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Salt lake city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 17% compared to 3% in Salt lake city.
  • Lexington has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 63% in Salt lake city.
  • In Salt lake city, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Lexington.
  • Salt lake city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Salt lake city at 8%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
  • In Salt lake city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lexington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lexington Salt lake city
Mental Health Not Good 21.6% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 15.3% 11.1%
Depression 30.4% 26.2%
Smoking 26.1% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 14.4% 14.8%
Obesity 39.9% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Salt lake city

  • More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 18.0% in Salt lake city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 30.4% compared to 26.2% in Salt lake city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 26.1% compared to 9.2% in Salt lake city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Salt lake city at 14.8% compared to 14.4% in Lexington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 39.9% compared to 31.8% in Salt lake city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Salt lake city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lexington Salt lake city
No Schooling 0.4% (29) 1.3% (2,733)
High School Diploma 22.4% (1,783) 9.3% (19,020)
Less than High School 14.6% (1,159) 10.5% (21,475)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (740) 33.0% (67,504)

Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Salt lake city

  • In Salt lake city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Lexington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 9.3% in Salt lake city.
  • More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 10.5% in Salt lake city.
  • In Salt lake city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.