Demographics details for Lexington, TN vs Panaca, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, TN vs Panaca, NV.
| Data | Lexington | Panaca |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,952 | 1,039 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $45,877 | $68,073 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Panaca
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 7,952, compared to 1,039 in Panaca.
- Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 34.3 years in Panaca.
- Panaca has a higher median income of $68,073, compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- In Panaca, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Panaca.
- Panaca has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Panaca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Panaca |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | Data is updating |
| White | 81 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Panaca
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 17% compared to 0% in Panaca.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Panaca at 92% compared to 81% in Lexington.
- Both Lexington and Panaca have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 1% compared to 0% in Panaca.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Panaca at 3%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
- In Panaca, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Panaca |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.6% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 30.4% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 26.1% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Panaca
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 18.1% in Panaca.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 30.4% compared to 22.8% in Panaca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 26.1% compared to 18.0% in Panaca.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Panaca at 18.2% compared to 14.4% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 39.9% compared to 33.4% in Panaca.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Panaca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Panaca |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (29) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.4% (1,783) | 20.0% (208) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (1,159) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (740) | 16.3% (169) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Panaca
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Panaca.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 20.0% in Panaca.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Panaca.
- In Panaca, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.