Demographics details for Lexington, TN vs Idyllwild, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, TN vs Idyllwild, CA.
| Data | Lexington | Idyllwild |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,952 | 3,491 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 49.2 years |
| Median Income | $45,877 | $86,442 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Idyllwild
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 7,952, compared to 3,491 in Idyllwild.
- The median age in Idyllwild is higher at 49.2 years, compared to 36.6 years in Lexington.
- Idyllwild has a higher median income of $86,442, compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- In Idyllwild, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Idyllwild.
- Idyllwild has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Idyllwild provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Idyllwild |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 2 |
| White | 81 | 63 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Idyllwild
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 17% compared to 2% in Idyllwild.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 63% in Idyllwild.
- In Idyllwild, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Lexington.
- Idyllwild has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Idyllwild at 4%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Idyllwild at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Idyllwild |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.6% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 30.4% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 26.1% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Idyllwild
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 15.5% in Idyllwild.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 30.4% compared to 18.5% in Idyllwild.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 26.1% compared to 12.1% in Idyllwild.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Idyllwild at 18.4% compared to 14.4% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 39.9% compared to 33.2% in Idyllwild.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Idyllwild.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Idyllwild |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (29) | 1.9% (68) |
| High School Diploma | 22.4% (1,783) | 12.1% (423) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (1,159) | 11.4% (398) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (740) | 31.9% (1,115) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Idyllwild
- In Idyllwild, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.4% in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 12.1% in Idyllwild.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 11.4% in Idyllwild.
- In Idyllwild, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.9% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.