Demographics details for Lexington, TN vs Greenville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, TN vs Greenville, NC.
| Data | Lexington | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,952 | 89,233 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 26.9 years |
| Median Income | $45,877 | $47,485 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 89,233, compared to 7,952 in Lexington.
- Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 26.9 years in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher median income of $47,485, compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lexington at 35.0% compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 23%, compared to 13% in Lexington.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 39 |
| White | 81 | 50 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 17% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 50% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Lexington.
- Greenville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Greenville at 4%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.6% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 30.4% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 26.1% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Greenville
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 17.0% in Greenville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 30.4% compared to 21.9% in Greenville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 26.1% compared to 17.1% in Greenville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lexington at 14.4% compared to 14.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 39.9% in Lexington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Greenville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (29) | 0.6% (512) |
| High School Diploma | 22.4% (1,783) | 10.3% (9,215) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (1,159) | 4.6% (4,082) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (740) | 20.9% (18,672) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 22.4% compared to 10.3% in Greenville.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 4.6% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.