Demographics details for Lexington, NE vs Shelbina, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NE vs Shelbina, MO.
| Data | Lexington | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,725 | 1,582 |
| Median Age | 30.0 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $63,939 | $52,050 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Shelbina
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 10,725, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
- The median age in Shelbina is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher median income of $63,939 compared to $52,050 in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Shelbina at 11%, compared to 9% in Lexington.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Lexington and Shelbina at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Shelbina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 5 |
| White | 4 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 64 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Shelbina
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 5% in Shelbina.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbina at 89% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 1% compared to 0% in Shelbina.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 64% compared to 3% in Shelbina.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 15% compared to 1% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 16.2% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 23.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 45.1% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Shelbina
- In Shelbina, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbina at 26.4% versus 16.2% in Lexington.
- Shelbina has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 18.6% in Lexington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 17.6% in Shelbina.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 45.1% compared to 39.6% in Shelbina.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.2% (660) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (1,463) | 31.1% (492) |
| Less than High School | 36.3% (3,892) | 17.6% (279) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (779) | 14.2% (225) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Shelbina
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.2% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.1% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 36.3% compared to 17.6% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.