Demographics details for Lexington, NE vs Seaside park, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NE vs Seaside park, NJ.
| Data | Lexington | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,725 | 1,473 |
| Median Age | 30.0 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $63,939 | $80,658 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 57.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Seaside park
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 10,725, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- The median age in Seaside park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658, compared to $63,939 in Lexington.
- In Seaside park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Seaside park.
- Seaside park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Seaside park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 3 |
| White | 4 | 90 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 3% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Seaside park at 90% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- In Seaside park, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 64% compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 15% compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lexington at 1% compared to 0% in Seaside park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 16.2% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 13.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 45.1% | 30.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Seaside park
- In Seaside park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Seaside park at 23.1% versus 16.2% in Lexington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 18.6% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Seaside park at 18.2% compared to 18.1% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 45.1% compared to 30.7% in Seaside park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Seaside park at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 6.2% (660) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (1,463) | 22.2% (327) |
| Less than High School | 36.3% (3,892) | 3.3% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (779) | 56.3% (830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 36.3% compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.