Demographics details for Lexington, NE vs Cordele, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NE vs Cordele, GA.

Data Lexington Cordele
Population 10,725 9,914
Median Age 30.0 years 36.7 years
Median Income $63,939 $33,166
Married Families 35.0% 24.0%
Poverty Level 9% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Lexington vs Cordele

  • In Lexington, the population is higher at 10,725, compared to 9,914 in Cordele.
  • The median age in Cordele is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
  • Lexington has a higher median income of $63,939 compared to $33,166 in Cordele.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lexington at 35.0% compared to 24.0% in Cordele.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cordele at 20%, compared to 9% in Lexington.
  • Cordele has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Lexington.

Demographics

Demographics Lexington vs Cordele provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lexington Cordele
Black 15 72
White 4 26
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 64 2
Two or More Races 15 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Cordele

  • In Cordele, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 72% compared to 15% in Lexington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cordele at 26% compared to 4% in Lexington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 1% compared to 0% in Cordele.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 64% compared to 2% in Cordele.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 15% compared to 0% in Cordele.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lexington at 1% compared to 0% in Cordele.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lexington Cordele
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 20.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 16.5%
Depression 16.2% 21.7%
Smoking 18.6% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 11.7%
Obesity 45.1% 46.6%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Cordele

  • In Cordele, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cordele at 21.7% versus 16.2% in Lexington.
  • Cordele has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 18.6% in Lexington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 11.7% in Cordele.
  • Cordele has higher obesity rates at 46.6% compared to 45.1% in Lexington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cordele at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lexington Cordele
No Schooling 6.2% (660) 0.6% (61)
High School Diploma 13.6% (1,463) 19.4% (1,923)
Less than High School 36.3% (3,892) 17.1% (1,693)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (779) 8.7% (866)

Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Cordele

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.6% in Cordele.
  • In Cordele, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
  • More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 36.3% compared to 17.1% in Cordele.
  • In Cordele, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.7% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.