Demographics details for Lexington, NE vs Citrus heights, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NE vs Citrus heights, CA.

Data Lexington Citrus heights
Population 10,725 86,433
Median Age 30.0 years 38.1 years
Median Income $63,939 $75,022
Married Families 35.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Lexington vs Citrus heights

  • The population in Citrus heights is higher at 86,433, compared to 10,725 in Lexington.
  • The median age in Citrus heights is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
  • Citrus heights has a higher median income of $75,022, compared to $63,939 in Lexington.
  • In Citrus heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Citrus heights at 10%, compared to 9% in Lexington.
  • Citrus heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Lexington.

Demographics

Demographics Lexington vs Citrus heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lexington Citrus heights
Black 15 3
White 4 62
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 64 20
Two or More Races 15 9
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Citrus heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 3% in Citrus heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Citrus heights at 62% compared to 4% in Lexington.
  • In Citrus heights, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Lexington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 64% compared to 20% in Citrus heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 15% compared to 9% in Citrus heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Citrus heights at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lexington Citrus heights
Mental Health Not Good 13.6% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 11.3%
Depression 16.2% 21.5%
Smoking 18.6% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 17.3%
Obesity 45.1% 32.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Citrus heights

  • In Citrus heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Citrus heights at 21.5% versus 16.2% in Lexington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 18.6% compared to 14.1% in Citrus heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 17.3% in Citrus heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 45.1% compared to 32.8% in Citrus heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Citrus heights at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lexington Citrus heights
No Schooling 6.2% (660) 1.5% (1,266)
High School Diploma 13.6% (1,463) 15.8% (13,657)
Less than High School 36.3% (3,892) 12.5% (10,787)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (779) 15.8% (13,696)

Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Citrus heights

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.5% in Citrus heights.
  • In Citrus heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
  • More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 36.3% compared to 12.5% in Citrus heights.
  • In Citrus heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.