Demographics details for Lexington, NC vs Whiting, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NC vs Whiting, KS.
| Data | Lexington | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,679 | 195 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $36,868 | $52,000 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Whiting
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 19,679, compared to 195 in Whiting.
- Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.7 years in Whiting.
- Whiting has a higher median income of $52,000, compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Whiting, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Whiting provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 31 | Data is updating |
| White | 38 | 87 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Whiting
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 31% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whiting at 87% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 16% compared to 2% in Whiting.
- Both Lexington and Whiting have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Whiting at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Whiting
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.1% in Whiting.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 25.0% compared to 22.9% in Whiting.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.1% compared to 17.9% in Whiting.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whiting at 19.3% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 42.7% compared to 39.3% in Whiting.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Whiting.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Whiting |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (531) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (3,355) | 28.7% (56) |
| Less than High School | 25.6% (5,036) | 9.2% (18) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,009) | 14.9% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Whiting
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
- In Whiting, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 25.6% compared to 9.2% in Whiting.
- In Whiting, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.