Demographics details for Lexington, NC vs Southlake, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NC vs Southlake, TX.
| Data | Lexington | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,679 | 31,102 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $36,868 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Southlake
- The population in Southlake is higher at 31,102, compared to 19,679 in Lexington.
- The median age in Southlake is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
- Southlake has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Southlake, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Southlake.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Southlake.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Southlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 31 | 1 |
| White | 38 | 68 |
| Asian | 4 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 31% compared to 1% in Southlake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Southlake at 68% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Southlake, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 4% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 16% compared to 9% in Southlake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 11% compared to 5% in Southlake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Southlake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 7.2% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Southlake
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.8% in Southlake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 25.0% compared to 21.3% in Southlake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.1% compared to 8.4% in Southlake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Southlake at 19.4% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 42.7% compared to 27.1% in Southlake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Southlake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Southlake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (531) | 0.0% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (3,355) | 4.2% (1,302) |
| Less than High School | 25.6% (5,036) | 1.3% (392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,009) | 46.0% (14,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Southlake
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Southlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 4.2% in Southlake.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 25.6% compared to 1.3% in Southlake.
- In Southlake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.0% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.