Demographics details for Lexington, NC vs Prescott valley, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NC vs Prescott valley, AZ.

Data Lexington Prescott valley
Population 19,679 49,075
Median Age 38.6 years 47.7 years
Median Income $36,868 $66,617
Married Families 31.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 15% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.4

Population Comparison: Lexington vs Prescott valley

  • The population in Prescott valley is higher at 49,075, compared to 19,679 in Lexington.
  • The median age in Prescott valley is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
  • Prescott valley has a higher median income of $66,617, compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
  • In Prescott valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
  • Lexington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 6% in Prescott valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.4% in Prescott valley.

Demographics

Demographics Lexington vs Prescott valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lexington Prescott valley
Black 31 1
White 38 67
Asian 4 1
Hispanic 16 19
Two or More Races 11 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Prescott valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 31% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Prescott valley at 67% compared to 38% in Lexington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 1% in Prescott valley.
  • Prescott valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 16% in Lexington.
  • Both Lexington and Prescott valley have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
  • In Prescott valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lexington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lexington Prescott valley
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 11.9%
Depression 25.0% 22.8%
Smoking 24.1% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 16.6%
Obesity 42.7% 28.1%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Prescott valley

  • More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Prescott valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 25.0% compared to 22.8% in Prescott valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.1% compared to 18.5% in Prescott valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Prescott valley at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 42.7% compared to 28.1% in Prescott valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Prescott valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lexington Prescott valley
No Schooling 2.7% (531) 0.8% (399)
High School Diploma 17.0% (3,355) 17.1% (8,386)
Less than High School 25.6% (5,036) 12.3% (6,044)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.2% (2,009) 15.9% (7,817)

Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Prescott valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Prescott valley.
  • In Prescott valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
  • More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 25.6% compared to 12.3% in Prescott valley.
  • In Prescott valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.