Demographics details for Lexington, NC vs Logansport, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NC vs Logansport, IN.
Data | Lexington | Logansport |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,679 | 18,194 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 37.3 years |
Median Income | $36,868 | $45,335 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Logansport
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 19,679, compared to 18,194 in Logansport.
- Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 37.3 years in Logansport.
- Logansport has a higher median income of $45,335, compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Logansport, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Logansport.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Logansport.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Logansport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lexington | Logansport |
---|---|---|
Black | 31 | 2 |
White | 38 | 56 |
Asian | 4 | 2 |
Hispanic | 16 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Logansport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 31% compared to 2% in Logansport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Logansport at 56% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 2% in Logansport.
- Logansport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 16% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 11% compared to 9% in Logansport.
- In Logansport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lexington | Logansport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.3% |
Depression | 25.0% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 24.1% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Logansport
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.9% in Logansport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Logansport at 25.9% versus 25.0% in Lexington.
- Logansport has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 24.1% in Lexington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Logansport at 16.1% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 42.7% compared to 41.5% in Logansport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Logansport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lexington | Logansport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (531) | 1.4% (262) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (3,355) | 24.1% (4,392) |
Less than High School | 25.6% (5,036) | 25.2% (4,582) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,009) | 7.5% (1,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Logansport
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.4% in Logansport.
- In Logansport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 25.6% compared to 25.2% in Logansport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 7.5% in Logansport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.