Demographics details for Lexington, NC vs Lemon cove, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NC vs Lemon cove, CA.
Data | Lexington | Lemon cove |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,679 | 498 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 39.7 years |
Median Income | $36,868 | $54,489 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Lemon cove
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 19,679, compared to 498 in Lemon cove.
- The median age in Lemon cove is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
- Lemon cove has a higher median income of $54,489, compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Lemon cove, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Lemon cove.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.1% in Lemon cove.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Lemon cove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lexington | Lemon cove |
---|---|---|
Black | 31 | Data is updating |
White | 38 | 58 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Lemon cove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 31% compared to 0% in Lemon cove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lemon cove at 58% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 0% in Lemon cove.
- Lemon cove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 16% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 11% compared to 3% in Lemon cove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Lemon cove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lexington | Lemon cove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 11.9% |
Depression | 25.0% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 24.1% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Lemon cove
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Lemon cove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 25.0% compared to 20.8% in Lemon cove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.1% compared to 14.1% in Lemon cove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lemon cove at 17.3% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 42.7% compared to 31.0% in Lemon cove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Lemon cove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lexington | Lemon cove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (531) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (3,355) | 24.9% (124) |
Less than High School | 25.6% (5,036) | 17.7% (88) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,009) | 20.9% (104) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Lemon cove
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Lemon cove.
- In Lemon cove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 25.6% compared to 17.7% in Lemon cove.
- In Lemon cove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.