Demographics details for Lexington, NC vs Granite bay, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NC vs Granite bay, CA.
Data | Lexington | Granite bay |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,679 | 22,180 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $36,868 | $177,803 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 2% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Granite bay
- The population in Granite bay is higher at 22,180, compared to 19,679 in Lexington.
- The median age in Granite bay is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
- Granite bay has a higher median income of $177,803, compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- In Granite bay, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 2% in Granite bay.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Granite bay.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Granite bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lexington | Granite bay |
---|---|---|
Black | 31 | 3 |
White | 38 | 74 |
Asian | 4 | 9 |
Hispanic | 16 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Granite bay
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 31% compared to 3% in Granite bay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Granite bay at 74% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Granite bay, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 4% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 16% compared to 9% in Granite bay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 11% compared to 5% in Granite bay.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Granite bay at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lexington | Granite bay |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 8.1% |
Depression | 25.0% | 18.9% |
Smoking | 24.1% | 8.6% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 24.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Granite bay
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.1% in Granite bay.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 25.0% compared to 18.9% in Granite bay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.1% compared to 8.6% in Granite bay.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Granite bay at 19.3% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 42.7% compared to 24.6% in Granite bay.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Granite bay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lexington | Granite bay |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (531) | 0.2% (45) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (3,355) | 6.4% (1,425) |
Less than High School | 25.6% (5,036) | 3.4% (753) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (2,009) | 41.4% (9,173) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Granite bay
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.2% in Granite bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 6.4% in Granite bay.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 25.6% compared to 3.4% in Granite bay.
- In Granite bay, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.4% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.