Demographics details for Lexington, NC vs Cape girardeau, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NC vs Cape girardeau, MO.

Data Lexington Cape girardeau
Population 19,679 40,377
Median Age 38.6 years 33.6 years
Median Income $36,868 $51,671
Married Families 31.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 15% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.6

Population Comparison: Lexington vs Cape girardeau

  • The population in Cape girardeau is higher at 40,377, compared to 19,679 in Lexington.
  • Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.6 years in Cape girardeau.
  • Cape girardeau has a higher median income of $51,671, compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
  • In Cape girardeau, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
  • Lexington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Cape girardeau.
  • The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.6% in Cape girardeau.

Demographics

Demographics Lexington vs Cape girardeau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lexington Cape girardeau
Black 31 14
White 38 74
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 16 4
Two or More Races 11 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Cape girardeau

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 31% compared to 14% in Cape girardeau.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cape girardeau at 74% compared to 38% in Lexington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 3% in Cape girardeau.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 16% compared to 4% in Cape girardeau.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 11% compared to 5% in Cape girardeau.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Cape girardeau at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lexington Cape girardeau
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 13.4%
Depression 25.0% 25.9%
Smoking 24.1% 21.0%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 17.1%
Obesity 42.7% 40.1%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Cape girardeau

  • More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Cape girardeau.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cape girardeau at 25.9% versus 25.0% in Lexington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.1% compared to 21.0% in Cape girardeau.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cape girardeau at 17.1% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 42.7% compared to 40.1% in Cape girardeau.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Cape girardeau.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lexington Cape girardeau
No Schooling 2.7% (531) 0.6% (235)
High School Diploma 17.0% (3,355) 14.6% (5,879)
Less than High School 25.6% (5,036) 9.4% (3,802)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.2% (2,009) 21.6% (8,705)

Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Cape girardeau

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in Cape girardeau.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 14.6% in Cape girardeau.
  • More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 25.6% compared to 9.4% in Cape girardeau.
  • In Cape girardeau, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.