Demographics details for Lexington, KY vs Worcester, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, KY vs Worcester, MA.

Data Lexington Worcester
Population 320,347 205,319
Median Age 35.2 years 34.3 years
Median Income $66,087 $63,011
Married Families 36.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.8

Population Comparison: Lexington vs Worcester

  • In Lexington, the population is higher at 320,347, compared to 205,319 in Worcester.
  • Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
  • Lexington has a higher median income of $66,087 compared to $63,011 in Worcester.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lexington at 36.0% compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
  • The poverty level is higher in Worcester at 12%, compared to 11% in Lexington.
  • Worcester has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.2% in Lexington.

Demographics

Demographics Lexington vs Worcester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lexington Worcester
Black 15 13
White 68 44
Asian 4 7
Hispanic 7 24
Two or More Races 6 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Worcester

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 13% in Worcester.
  • Lexington has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 44% in Worcester.
  • In Worcester, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 4% in Lexington.
  • Worcester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 7% in Lexington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Worcester at 12%, compared to 6% in Lexington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Worcester at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lexington Worcester
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 11.8%
Depression 24.0% 23.1%
Smoking 17.0% 17.1%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 15.5%
Obesity 36.0% 34.8%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Worcester

  • In Worcester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.1% in Lexington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.0% compared to 23.1% in Worcester.
  • Worcester has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lexington at 15.9% compared to 15.5% in Worcester.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 36.0% compared to 34.8% in Worcester.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Worcester at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Lexington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lexington Worcester
No Schooling 0.6% (2,032) 1.7% (3,577)
High School Diploma 9.9% (31,844) 15.6% (31,987)
Less than High School 8.7% (27,787) 16.0% (32,925)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.4% (97,540) 21.5% (44,155)

Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Worcester

  • In Worcester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Lexington.
  • In Worcester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Worcester at 16.0%, compared to 8.7% in Lexington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 21.5% in Worcester.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.