Demographics details for Lexington, KY vs Earlham, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, KY vs Earlham, IA.
| Data | Lexington | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 320,347 | 1,423 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $66,087 | $103,977 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Earlham
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 320,347, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- The median age in Earlham is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 35.2 years in Lexington.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977, compared to $66,087 in Lexington.
- In Earlham, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Earlham.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Earlham.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Earlham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lexington | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 2 |
| White | 68 | 95 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Earlham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earlham at 95% compared to 68% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 0% in Earlham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 7% compared to 1% in Earlham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 6% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Earlham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lexington | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 18.4% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 23.0% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Earlham
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.0% compared to 18.4% in Earlham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 17.0% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 15.9% in Lexington.
- Earlham has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lexington | Earlham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (2,032) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 9.9% (31,844) | 13.8% (197) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (27,787) | 6.0% (85) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (97,540) | 17.0% (242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Earlham
- In Earlham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Lexington.
- In Earlham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 17.0% in Earlham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.