Demographics details for Lexington, KY vs Blackwater, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, KY vs Blackwater, MO.
Data | Lexington | Blackwater |
---|---|---|
Population | 320,347 | 173 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 28.2 years |
Median Income | $66,087 | $85,179 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Blackwater
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 320,347, compared to 173 in Blackwater.
- Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 28.2 years in Blackwater.
- Blackwater has a higher median income of $85,179, compared to $66,087 in Lexington.
- In Blackwater, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Blackwater.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Blackwater.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Blackwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lexington | Blackwater |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | Data is updating |
White | 68 | 92 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Blackwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 0% in Blackwater.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Blackwater at 92% compared to 68% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 0% in Blackwater.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 7% compared to 0% in Blackwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Blackwater at 8%, compared to 6% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Blackwater at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lexington | Blackwater |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.6% |
Depression | 24.0% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 21.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 36.0% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Blackwater
- In Blackwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.1% in Lexington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Blackwater at 25.7% versus 24.0% in Lexington.
- Blackwater has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Blackwater at 18.8% compared to 15.9% in Lexington.
- Blackwater has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lexington at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Blackwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lexington | Blackwater |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (2,032) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.9% (31,844) | 25.4% (44) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (27,787) | 6.9% (12) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (97,540) | 19.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Blackwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Blackwater.
- In Blackwater, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 6.9% in Blackwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 19.1% in Blackwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.