Demographics details for Lexington, KY vs Blackfoot, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, KY vs Blackfoot, ID.
Data | Lexington | Blackfoot |
---|---|---|
Population | 320,347 | 12,702 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $66,087 | $57,951 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Blackfoot
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 320,347, compared to 12,702 in Blackfoot.
- Residents in Lexington have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 34.4 years in Blackfoot.
- Lexington has a higher median income of $66,087 compared to $57,951 in Blackfoot.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lexington and Blackfoot at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Blackfoot at 13%, compared to 11% in Lexington.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Blackfoot.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Blackfoot provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lexington | Blackfoot |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | Data is updating |
White | 68 | 71 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Blackfoot
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 0% in Blackfoot.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Blackfoot at 71% compared to 68% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 0% in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 7% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Blackfoot at 7%, compared to 6% in Lexington.
- In Blackfoot, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lexington | Blackfoot |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.6% |
Depression | 24.0% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 36.0% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Blackfoot
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.0% in Blackfoot.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.0%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Blackfoot.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lexington at 15.9% compared to 14.3% in Blackfoot.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 36.0%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Blackfoot at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lexington | Blackfoot |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (2,032) | 0.1% (16) |
High School Diploma | 9.9% (31,844) | 15.5% (1,974) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (27,787) | 13.2% (1,678) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (97,540) | 13.6% (1,726) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Blackfoot
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Blackfoot.
- In Blackfoot, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blackfoot at 13.2%, compared to 8.7% in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 13.6% in Blackfoot.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.