Demographics details for Lexington, KY vs Averill park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, KY vs Averill park, NY.

Data Lexington Averill park
Population 320,347 1,608
Median Age 35.2 years 53.3 years
Median Income $66,087 $109,746
Married Families 36.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 11% 4%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Lexington vs Averill park

  • In Lexington, the population is higher at 320,347, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 35.2 years in Lexington.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $66,087 in Lexington.
  • In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
  • Lexington has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Averill park.

Demographics

Demographics Lexington vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lexington Averill park
Black 15 Data is updating
White 68 100
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 68% in Lexington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 7% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 6% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Averill park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lexington Averill park
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 9.1%
Depression 24.0% 23.7%
Smoking 17.0% 15.9%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 21.5%
Obesity 36.0% 34.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Averill park

  • More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.0% compared to 23.7% in Averill park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 17.0% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 15.9% in Lexington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 36.0% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Averill park at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Lexington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lexington Averill park
No Schooling 0.6% (2,032) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 9.9% (31,844) 22.0% (354)
Less than High School 8.7% (27,787) 3.7% (60)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.4% (97,540) 32.3% (520)

Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
  • More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 30.4% in Lexington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.