Demographics details for Lexington, KY vs Averill park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, KY vs Averill park, NY.
Data | Lexington | Averill park |
---|---|---|
Population | 320,347 | 1,608 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 53.3 years |
Median Income | $66,087 | $109,746 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Averill park
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 320,347, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
- The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 35.2 years in Lexington.
- Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $66,087 in Lexington.
- In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 4% in Averill park.
- The unemployment rate in Lexington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Averill park.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lexington | Averill park |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | Data is updating |
White | 68 | 100 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Averill park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 68% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Lexington at 4% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 7% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 6% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Averill park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lexington | Averill park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 9.1% |
Depression | 24.0% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 15.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 21.5% |
Obesity | 36.0% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Averill park
- More residents in Lexington report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lexington at 24.0% compared to 23.7% in Averill park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 17.0% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 15.9% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 36.0% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Averill park at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lexington | Averill park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (2,032) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.9% (31,844) | 22.0% (354) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (27,787) | 3.7% (60) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.4% (97,540) | 32.3% (520) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Averill park
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 30.4% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.