Demographics details for Lewiston, ME vs Hazel, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lewiston, ME vs Hazel, KY.
| Data | Lewiston | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,493 | 398 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,317 | $36,765 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Lewiston vs Hazel
- In Lewiston, the population is higher at 38,493, compared to 398 in Hazel.
- Residents in Lewiston have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Hazel.
- Lewiston has a higher median income of $54,317 compared to $36,765 in Hazel.
- In Hazel, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Lewiston.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazel at 14%, compared to 11% in Lewiston.
- Hazel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Lewiston.
Demographics
Demographics Lewiston vs Hazel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lewiston | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 10 |
| White | 79 | 76 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lewiston vs Hazel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lewiston at 11% compared to 10% in Hazel.
- Lewiston has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 76% in Hazel.
- In Hazel, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Lewiston and Hazel at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hazel at 6%, compared to 5% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lewiston and Hazel at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lewiston | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 30.0% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lewiston vs Hazel
- More residents in Lewiston report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.3% in Hazel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lewiston at 30.0% compared to 27.6% in Hazel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lewiston at 21.9% compared to 19.0% in Hazel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lewiston at 16.1% compared to 15.0% in Hazel.
- Hazel has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 37.8% in Lewiston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel at 35.0% compared to 20.0% in Lewiston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lewiston | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (574) | 0.8% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (7,566) | 21.9% (87) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (5,195) | 21.1% (84) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (5,538) | 9.0% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lewiston vs Hazel
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Hazel.
- In Hazel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 19.7% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazel at 21.1%, compared to 13.5% in Lewiston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 9.0% in Hazel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.