Demographics details for Lewiston, ME vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lewiston, ME vs Clarksville, AR.
Data | Lewiston | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Population | 38,493 | 9,555 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $54,317 | $35,911 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lewiston vs Clarksville
- In Lewiston, the population is higher at 38,493, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- Residents in Lewiston have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Lewiston has a higher median income of $54,317 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Lewiston.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 11% in Lewiston.
- Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Lewiston.
Demographics
Demographics Lewiston vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lewiston | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 3 |
White | 79 | 60 |
Asian | 2 | 6 |
Hispanic | 3 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lewiston vs Clarksville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lewiston at 11% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- Lewiston has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Lewiston.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 3% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarksville at 7%, compared to 5% in Lewiston.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lewiston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lewiston | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 21.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.3% |
Depression | 30.0% | 27.9% |
Smoking | 21.9% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lewiston vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 19.5% in Lewiston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lewiston at 30.0% compared to 27.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 21.9% in Lewiston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lewiston at 16.1% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 37.8% in Lewiston.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Lewiston and Clarksville at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lewiston | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (574) | 4.2% (402) |
High School Diploma | 19.7% (7,566) | 21.6% (2,064) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (5,195) | 28.6% (2,735) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (5,538) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lewiston vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.5% in Lewiston.
- In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 19.7% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 13.5% in Lewiston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.