Demographics details for Lewiston, ME vs Arthurdale, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lewiston, ME vs Arthurdale, WV.
Data | Lewiston | Arthurdale |
---|---|---|
Population | 38,493 | 287 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $54,317 | $55,000 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Lewiston vs Arthurdale
- In Lewiston, the population is higher at 38,493, compared to 287 in Arthurdale.
- Residents in Lewiston have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 35.0 years in Arthurdale.
- Arthurdale has a higher median income of $55,000, compared to $54,317 in Lewiston.
- In Arthurdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 33.0% in Lewiston.
- The poverty level is higher in Arthurdale at 15%, compared to 11% in Lewiston.
- Arthurdale has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Lewiston.
Demographics
Demographics Lewiston vs Arthurdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lewiston | Arthurdale |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | Data is updating |
White | 79 | 95 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lewiston vs Arthurdale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lewiston at 11% compared to 0% in Arthurdale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Arthurdale at 95% compared to 79% in Lewiston.
- The Asian population is larger in Lewiston at 2% compared to 1% in Arthurdale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lewiston at 3% compared to 2% in Arthurdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lewiston at 5% compared to 2% in Arthurdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lewiston and Arthurdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lewiston | Arthurdale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 30.0% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 21.9% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 37.8% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lewiston vs Arthurdale
- More residents in Lewiston report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lewiston at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lewiston at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lewiston at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lewiston at 37.8% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lewiston at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lewiston | Arthurdale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (574) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.7% (7,566) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (5,195) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (5,538) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lewiston vs Arthurdale
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
- More residents in Lewiston have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Arthurdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.