Demographics details for Lewiston, ID vs Walnut bottom, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lewiston, ID vs Walnut bottom, PA.

Data Lewiston Walnut bottom
Population 34,896 422
Median Age 39.8 years 37.0 years
Median Income $63,109 $55,000
Married Families 39.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Lewiston vs Walnut bottom

  • In Lewiston, the population is higher at 34,896, compared to 422 in Walnut bottom.
  • Residents in Lewiston have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 37.0 years in Walnut bottom.
  • Lewiston has a higher median income of $63,109 compared to $55,000 in Walnut bottom.
  • In Walnut bottom, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 39.0% in Lewiston.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Lewiston and Walnut bottom at 10%.
  • Walnut bottom has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Lewiston.

Demographics

Demographics Lewiston vs Walnut bottom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lewiston Walnut bottom
Black Data is updating 1
White 89 98
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 1
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lewiston vs Walnut bottom

  • In Walnut bottom, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Lewiston.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Walnut bottom at 98% compared to 89% in Lewiston.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lewiston at 1% compared to 0% in Walnut bottom.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Lewiston at 4% compared to 1% in Walnut bottom.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lewiston at 5% compared to 0% in Walnut bottom.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lewiston at 1% compared to 0% in Walnut bottom.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lewiston Walnut bottom
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% Data is updating%
Depression 24.4% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 36.2% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 17.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lewiston vs Walnut bottom

  • More residents in Lewiston report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lewiston at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lewiston at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lewiston at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lewiston at 36.2% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lewiston at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lewiston Walnut bottom
No Schooling 0.8% (292) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.0% (5,600) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 9.3% (3,257) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.6% (6,140) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Lewiston vs Walnut bottom

  • A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • More residents in Lewiston have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Walnut bottom.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.