Demographics details for Lewiston, ID vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lewiston, ID vs Trumann, AR.
Data | Lewiston | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,896 | 7,305 |
Median Age | 39.8 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $63,109 | $37,618 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lewiston vs Trumann
- In Lewiston, the population is higher at 34,896, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- The median age in Trumann is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 39.8 years in Lewiston.
- Lewiston has a higher median income of $63,109 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lewiston at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 10% in Lewiston.
- Trumann has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Lewiston.
Demographics
Demographics Lewiston vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lewiston | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 89 | 84 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lewiston vs Trumann
- In Trumann, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Lewiston.
- Lewiston has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 84% in Trumann.
- The Asian population is larger in Lewiston at 1% compared to 0% in Trumann.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lewiston at 4% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 5% in Lewiston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lewiston at 1% compared to 0% in Trumann.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lewiston | Trumann |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 15.2% |
Depression | 24.4% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 15.8% | 25.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 36.2% | 44.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lewiston vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.6% in Lewiston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 24.4% in Lewiston.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 15.8% in Lewiston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lewiston at 18.4% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 36.2% in Lewiston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Lewiston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lewiston | Trumann |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (292) | 1.8% (135) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (5,600) | 25.9% (1,895) |
Less than High School | 9.3% (3,257) | 24.4% (1,780) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (6,140) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lewiston vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Lewiston.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 16.0% in Lewiston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 9.3% in Lewiston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lewiston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.